Автор cetsalcoatle, января 28, 2015, 22:39
0 Пользователи и 1 гость просматривают эту тему.
ЦитироватьAlthough it is evidently far too early to make any sort of inference about the history of Land Dayak, there are some similarities between this group and some of the Orang Asli languages which are striking enoughto be mentioned, and which are certainly a topic for further investigation.
Цитата: Nevik Xukxo от февраля 1, 2015, 15:57Вы против гипотезы хотя бы частичного аустроазиатского присутствия на Суматре, Калимантане, Яве до австронезийцев?
Цитата: unlight от февраля 1, 2015, 21:05А источники есть какие-нибудь на эту тему? По-моему, даже в википедии об этом не говорится.
ЦитироватьIn fact, we find at least three types of evidence for lexi-cal contact, and thus contact between populations. These area. Similarities between MSEA branches (Bahnaric, Katuic, Vietic) of Austroasiatic and Borneo Austronesianb. Similarities between the Aslian languages of the Malay Peninsula and Borneo Austronesianc. Similarities between Austronesian and Austroasiatic due to the trade-driven expansion of MalayThe interest of these, in particular the first two, is that these populations have no contact today. Borrowing such as we find must therefore be evidence of past contact in prehis-tory by processes that remain to be described.
ЦитироватьIt is suggested here that there were Austroasiatic-speakers in West-Central Borneo, as far as the island of Pala-wan, prior to the arrival of Austronesian in the area.
Цитироватьc) Acehnese. Thurgood and Sidwell treated Acehnese as related to the Chamic languages, and it certainly has a significant stratum of Chamic lexicon. However, it also has cognates with mainstream Austroasiatic and vocabulary with no clear etymology. It is therefore possible, as Diffolth (p.c.) has argued, that Acehnese represents a residual Austroasiatic language that has come under heavy Chamic influence.d) Bornean substrate languages. Some Austronesianists (Adelaar in particular) have argued that unusual phonological features of Borneo languages such as Bidayuh point to a possible Austroasiatic substrate. Other linguists, including Robert Blust, claim that these features can be explained by processes internal to Austronesian. However, cultural evidence for mainland presence on Borneo is extremely strong, and such early contact is quite likely.
Обратите внимание: данное сообщение не будет отображаться, пока модератор не одобрит его.
Страница создана за 0.114 сек. Запросов: 22.